<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Conversation with Hennessy and Patterson</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thinkingparallel.com/2007/02/14/a-conversation-with-hennessy-and-patterson/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thinkingparallel.com/2007/02/14/a-conversation-with-hennessy-and-patterson/</link>
	<description>A Blog on Parallel Programming and Concurrency by Michael Suess</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 00:39:50 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: An interview with Hennessy and Patterson &#124; insideHPC</title>
		<link>http://www.thinkingparallel.com/2007/02/14/a-conversation-with-hennessy-and-patterson/comment-page-1/#comment-2277</link>
		<dc:creator>An interview with Hennessy and Patterson &#124; insideHPC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2007 15:12:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinkingparallel.com/2007/02/14/a-conversation-with-hennessy-and-patterson/#comment-2277</guid>
		<description>[...] Mike over at Thinking Parallel blog posts a pointer to an interview in the ACM Queue with John Hennessy and David Patterson, authors of Computer Architecture: A Quantitative Approach (as if you didn&#8217;t already know that). [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Mike over at Thinking Parallel blog posts a pointer to an interview in the ACM Queue with John Hennessy and David Patterson, authors of Computer Architecture: A Quantitative Approach (as if you didn&#8217;t already know that). [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christopher C. Aycock</title>
		<link>http://www.thinkingparallel.com/2007/02/14/a-conversation-with-hennessy-and-patterson/comment-page-1/#comment-2251</link>
		<dc:creator>Christopher C. Aycock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2007 23:34:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinkingparallel.com/2007/02/14/a-conversation-with-hennessy-and-patterson/#comment-2251</guid>
		<description>I love H&#38;P's book; I've read the 2nd and 3rd editions straight through and I'm looking forward to the 4th. As for what they're saying, yes, parallelism is the biggest thing in transitor-based architecture, between multicore CPUs on one side and co-processors on the other. As for FPGAs, they're great for hardware designers (though I am skeptical that an end-user would want to use them).

The other big announcements this week were interesting too, like Intel's 80-core chip, IBM's embedded DRAM, and D-Wave quantum computer. What a week for HPC.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love H&amp;P&#8217;s book; I&#8217;ve read the 2nd and 3rd editions straight through and I&#8217;m looking forward to the 4th. As for what they&#8217;re saying, yes, parallelism is the biggest thing in transitor-based architecture, between multicore CPUs on one side and co-processors on the other. As for FPGAs, they&#8217;re great for hardware designers (though I am skeptical that an end-user would want to use them).</p>
<p>The other big announcements this week were interesting too, like Intel&#8217;s 80-core chip, IBM&#8217;s embedded DRAM, and D-Wave quantum computer. What a week for HPC.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
