<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nvidia releases Cuda - and reinvents Stream Processing?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thinkingparallel.com/2007/02/17/nvidia-releases-cuda-and-reinvents-stream-processing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thinkingparallel.com/2007/02/17/nvidia-releases-cuda-and-reinvents-stream-processing/</link>
	<description>A Blog on Parallel Programming and Concurrency by Michael Suess</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 02:32:08 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: tramdas</title>
		<link>http://www.thinkingparallel.com/2007/02/17/nvidia-releases-cuda-and-reinvents-stream-processing/#comment-3179</link>
		<dc:creator>tramdas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2007 03:11:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinkingparallel.com/2007/02/17/nvidia-releases-cuda-and-reinvents-stream-processing/#comment-3179</guid>
		<description>This is a bit OT because it is not specific to Cuda... 

Over the past few months there has been quite a lot of buzz over stream processing. However, I've been having a hard time really grasping what the difference is between stream processing and vector processing. Is a "stream processor" really any different than a "vector processor"? Or is the term "stream processing" in reference specifically to a slightly more sophisticated programming model?

p/s-love the blog Michael!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a bit OT because it is not specific to Cuda&#8230; </p>
<p>Over the past few months there has been quite a lot of buzz over stream processing. However, I&#8217;ve been having a hard time really grasping what the difference is between stream processing and vector processing. Is a &#8220;stream processor&#8221; really any different than a &#8220;vector processor&#8221;? Or is the term &#8220;stream processing&#8221; in reference specifically to a slightly more sophisticated programming model?</p>
<p>p/s-love the blog Michael!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Suess</title>
		<link>http://www.thinkingparallel.com/2007/02/17/nvidia-releases-cuda-and-reinvents-stream-processing/#comment-2561</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Suess</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2007 08:16:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinkingparallel.com/2007/02/17/nvidia-releases-cuda-and-reinvents-stream-processing/#comment-2561</guid>
		<description>Wes: you have a point. Cuda definitly looks saner than the alternatives (not that I know all of them). Whether or not they manage to *kill* them is another matter :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wes: you have a point. Cuda definitly looks saner than the alternatives (not that I know all of them). Whether or not they manage to *kill* them is another matter <img src='http://www.thinkingparallel.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wes Felter</title>
		<link>http://www.thinkingparallel.com/2007/02/17/nvidia-releases-cuda-and-reinvents-stream-processing/#comment-2541</link>
		<dc:creator>Wes Felter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Feb 2007 23:26:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinkingparallel.com/2007/02/17/nvidia-releases-cuda-and-reinvents-stream-processing/#comment-2541</guid>
		<description>I would actually say that NVidia has *killed* stream processing (and the associated startups) and replaced it with something saner.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would actually say that NVidia has *killed* stream processing (and the associated startups) and replaced it with something saner.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
