Comments on: Exceptions and OpenMP - an Experiment with Current Compilers http://www.thinkingparallel.com/2007/03/02/exceptions-and-openmp-an-experiment-with-current-compilers/ A Blog on Parallel Programming and Concurrency by Michael Suess Wed, 19 Jun 2013 00:34:32 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7 hourly 1 By: Bram http://www.thinkingparallel.com/2007/03/02/exceptions-and-openmp-an-experiment-with-current-compilers/comment-page-1/#comment-98287 Bram Wed, 04 Nov 2009 11:56:37 +0000 http://www.thinkingparallel.com/2007/03/02/exceptions-and-openmp-an-experiment-with-current-compilers/#comment-98287 Hi, just like to ad, this works with g++, no warnings no problems: g++ -fopenmp -lgomp openmp_exceptions.cc; ./a.out ZERO, before parallel: ts 42 &ts 0x7fff8c0df44c ONE, before try-catch: ts 42 &ts 0x7fff8c0df44c TWO, inside try: ts 42 &ts 0x7fff8c0df44c FOUR, after catch, inside parallel: ts 42 &ts 0x7fff8c0df44c FIVE, after parallel: ts 42 &ts 0x7fff8c0df44c g++ --version g++ (Ubuntu 4.4.1-4ubuntu8) 4.4.1 (it's in Ubuntu Karmic) Hi, just like to ad, this works with g++, no warnings no problems:
g++ -fopenmp -lgomp openmp_exceptions.cc; ./a.out
ZERO, before parallel:
ts 42 &ts 0×7fff8c0df44c

ONE, before try-catch:
ts 42 &ts 0×7fff8c0df44c

TWO, inside try:
ts 42 &ts 0×7fff8c0df44c

FOUR, after catch, inside parallel:
ts 42 &ts 0×7fff8c0df44c

FIVE, after parallel:
ts 42 &ts 0×7fff8c0df44c

g++ –version
g++ (Ubuntu 4.4.1-4ubuntu8) 4.4.1
(it’s in Ubuntu Karmic)

]]> By: Michael Suess http://www.thinkingparallel.com/2007/03/02/exceptions-and-openmp-an-experiment-with-current-compilers/comment-page-1/#comment-3279 Michael Suess Tue, 06 Mar 2007 16:12:50 +0000 http://www.thinkingparallel.com/2007/03/02/exceptions-and-openmp-an-experiment-with-current-compilers/#comment-3279 Paul: every compiler I know has exception-flags. The difference here is, that exceptions on the first three compilers are clearly enabled and still my code is not working... Paul: every compiler I know has exception-flags. The difference here is, that exceptions on the first three compilers are clearly enabled and still my code is not working…

]]> By: Paul http://www.thinkingparallel.com/2007/03/02/exceptions-and-openmp-an-experiment-with-current-compilers/comment-page-1/#comment-3084 Paul Fri, 02 Mar 2007 14:47:46 +0000 http://www.thinkingparallel.com/2007/03/02/exceptions-and-openmp-an-experiment-with-current-compilers/#comment-3084 Is it possible the first three compilers also have sneaky exception flags like the Portland one? Nice post, Paul Is it possible the first three compilers also have sneaky exception flags like the Portland one?

Nice post,
Paul

]]> By: Christopher C. Aycock http://www.thinkingparallel.com/2007/03/02/exceptions-and-openmp-an-experiment-with-current-compilers/comment-page-1/#comment-3082 Christopher C. Aycock Fri, 02 Mar 2007 14:23:41 +0000 http://www.thinkingparallel.com/2007/03/02/exceptions-and-openmp-an-experiment-with-current-compilers/#comment-3082 I guess this is just yet another example of what's ultimately wrong with C++: it's just too complex. Dynamically typed languages such as Ruby and Python are much easier to deal with, for everyone's sake. Of course a really clean statically typed language with templates would be nice too, but none of the existing ones can be found in the mainstream. I guess this is just yet another example of what’s ultimately wrong with C++: it’s just too complex. Dynamically typed languages such as Ruby and Python are much easier to deal with, for everyone’s sake. Of course a really clean statically typed language with templates would be nice too, but none of the existing ones can be found in the mainstream.

]]>